I'm talking about Kostelnick and Roberts chapter 4: Linear Components, people. How much of that chapter is actually news to anyone living in this digital age? Are their points not obvious? Of course your reader is going to get annoyed if put the whole message in uppercase, or you squash the letters all together, or the text is really small. I would say these things are given. Reading that chapter, I did not feel like an educated college student. 
In the preface of their book, they say "we envisioned students who are taking advanced courses in professional communication... the book will extend to visual design the writing and rhetorical principles they've applied in previous courses" (Kostelnick and Roberts, xxi). Wouldn't something as simple as what they call "linear components" have been covered in previous courses, then? This does not fit my idea of advanced. Kostelnick might very well be a nice guy, but if he ever lost ethos, this would be it: underestimating his proposed audience. They also claim that for this second edition of the textbook, to reduce the cost, they did "some tightening up of the remaining chapters" (xxiv). Personally, I could have used a lot more "tightening".
To summarize the chapter in a few sentences:
Linear components, such as typeface, size, bolding or italicizing affect the clarity, tone, emphasis that the reader perceives. You can do a lot of different things to text besides those already listed, including adding or removing space between the letters and words, changing the shape or how a block of text is organized. It is important to note that some typefaces are sans serif, some are monoline, and some are wider than others.
Put some images to describe the points, and there you go, folks.


0

Add a comment

Trap. The combination of the genres of trance and rap usually through sound mixing and editing, has become a staple of parties and festival shows. They share similar use of synth, heavy base and spoken words to create music.
When we talked in class about usability and the internet, it sounded like the conclusion as to what makes a usable website is simplicity. Creating a website to serve a very obvious purpose is the key to usability.
Every day we are faced with multiple typefaces: the good, the bad and the ugly. Some help us to read faster and more clearly, some to invoke a specific feeling or emotion, all the while persuading us to do something (or buy something).
... and how clashing implications continue to shape our reactions to these colors.

Depending on the region and cultural upbringing, one may have different connotations associated with the colors black, white, and red.
When talking about the ethics and rhetoric of data displays in class, I brought up the example of geographic information system (GIS) and their technique of interpolation.
"The Cognitive Style of Powerpoint" makes the assertion that:

The core ideas of teaching- explanation, reasoning, finding

things out, questioning, content, evidence, credible authority not patronizing

authoritarianism-are contrary to the cognitive style of PowerPoint.
When I first pulled out Tufte's packet on Power Point, it looked like one of the most boring texts on the planet. 30 pages on the style of Power Point? But as I read, I started to see his point and even found myself laughing at certain parts (talking about the “stupefied audience”).
Blog Archive
Contributors
Loading
Dynamic Views theme. Powered by Blogger. Report Abuse.